Freedom, Democracy, and The Fundamental Human Right

16 Responses

  1. T2014 says:

    “Freedem” is nonsense and impossible as soon as you have more than one individual involved. In any other combination, you will have to arrange somehow with others and the way you define freedom will not be the same as what the next neighbour thinks about it.

    The above is just a bunch of utopian blabber, sorry.

  2. Temeka says:

    I think this is among the most significant information for me.
    And i’m satisfied reading your article. However wanted to present my
    observation on some common things; The website taste is ideal, the articles is really nice.
    Just the right process, cheers

  3. Rob Pitt says:

    The question is; who is going to restore the fundamental human right, the Right to Own the Product – as you called it? People don’t even understand the meaning of Human Rights. When they celebrate the destruction of other countries, killing of other people, do they think about the Human Rights of those people?

    It is sick to observe the behavior of most of the people.

    Thank you for trying to bring in some sanity to this insane world.

  4. Roy Villa says:

    Excellent! Very well written. The voice of all of us.

    But who is going to establish such a just system where all the human rights of people’s are reserved?
    Who is going to dismantle this global tyranny?

    The truth is, this is all a pipe dream.

  5. Dave Chandran says:

    Very well written. But, who cares about the rights of other humans? This is the world of the wealthy.
    BTW. I liked the way you framed your words, I mean literally.

  6. Joe Hara says:

    Very true. The Fundamental Human Right is the right to own our own work, our own production. Who gives a dings about the “right to free speech” BS after this right. All the tyrant, the kings, queens, and the billionaires, are thriving on the loot of the working class’ work and production. Take away their “right” to loot, and all the misery and wars will end in a blink.

  7. lee says:

    klara really????!!!!!! we all know how to be civilised, we don’t need a government to tell us how. if I’m not ‘allowed’ to govern myself, then how can anyone else be qualified to do so?

  8. Klara Mills says:

    No government. No authority. What are you promoting – Anarchy?
    For the functioning of any civilized society, there must be a strong government.

    • Anonymous says:

      Do you have a clue

    • Eldon Warman says:

      Karla, You need to listen carefully to Larken Rose – and learn.

    • John says:

      No you are mistaken. A very limited Governemt with massive limitations placed on them is what is required. The problem is very soon after being elected, governments simply stop being responsive to the people, but become very responsive to the elites. That is why there must be srtick limitation placed on them.
      The appointed political leasders all become arrogant. They soon attempt to create lawss for everyone else except themselves.
      Once people allow the government inroads into their freedoms or uses those same freedoms as bargaining chips for security, it quickly becomes a slippery slope to outright tyranny.

      Governments comprise many thousands of faceless bureaucrats, at all levels of government, who have wide delegated powers to impose fines, refuse permissions, and generally ensnare in red tape, the hapless citizenry they’re notionally meant to serve. Therefore the limitations.

  9. Thomas Richardson says:

    Me, my wife, and many of our friends have been hooked to your articles. Your theme is humanity, which is so difficult to find nowadays. But, in this essay, I have a feeling that you finished it up in a haste, rather abruptly. It seems like the Part I of the ‘Part II’ sort of essay.

    Is there a Part II coming?

  10. Mike Vito says:

    A good Philosophical Essay.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.